Under
a Charter proclaimed January 13, 1849, the Crown granted control of
Vancouver Island to the Hudson’s Bay Company for seven shillings a year.
In return for proprietary rights, the HBC was to promote colonization.
(Ireland, Willard, “Memorandum re: Title to Beacon Hill Park, Victoria,
British Columbia,” May 8, 1942, p.1 BCA)
In
1849, Victoria replaced Fort Vancouver as HBC headquarters on the
Pacific Coast. Chief Factor James Douglas, age 49, moved with his family
from Fort Vancouver to live permanently in Victoria.
Victoria land is divided according to the Wakefield System
James
Douglas was instructed to organize the new Colony of Vancouver Island
according to the specific requirements of the Wakefield System. This
theory of colonization was promoted by key English government and
Hudson’s Bay Company leaders including Lord Earl Grey and Sir John
Pelly, who was simultaneously Governor of the HBC and the Bank of
England. The Wakefield System was already in place in New Zealand and
South Australia.
Archibald
Barclay, in a letter to Douglas dated December 17, 1849, explained the
goal of Edward Gibbon Wakefield’s theory of colonization:
“The object...should be...to transfer to the new country whatever is
most valuable and most approved in the institutions of the old, so that
Society may, as far as possible, consist of the same classes, united
together by the same ties...such conditions for the...disposal of
lands...will have the effect...of preventing the ingress of squatters,
paupers and land Speculators.” (Bowsfield, Hartwell, ed. Fort Victoria Letters, 1846-1851. Hudson’s Bay Record Society, Volume XXXII, Winnipeg, 1979, p. lii-liii)
The
goal was to promote an “ideal society” by establishing the English
class structure and social conditions on Vancouver Island. In this
model, gentlemen owned the land and labourers did the work. Land
distribution policies were designed to exclude lower classes from owning
land. This policy was in stark contrast to the Oregon Territory, where
free land was offered to encourage American settlers. Douglas
consistently advocated a free land policy on Vancouver Island to attract
immigrants, but London did not agree. The American system was exactly
what they did not want. As a further safeguard to keep out American
“riffraff,” only British citizens could own land in the Colony.
Historian
Richard Mackie describes the Wakefield System as “a colonial theory
premised on high land prices, a land-based exclusionary franchise, and
the hope of an ordered and hierarchical society.” (Mackie, “The
Colonization of Vancouver Island, 1849-1858,” BC Studies, No. 96, Winter, 1992-93, p. 3)
London
directed Douglas to charge colonists one pound sterling per acre for
land, with a minimum purchase of 20 acres. It was anticipated that 300
acres would be purchased by most gentlemen. The HBC was to use 90% of
the money from land revenues on improvements such as schools, roads,
bridges, so that settlers would have the benefit of infrastructure and
institutions. The other 10% of the land sales money would be profit for
the Company.
In
addition to the land purchase price, buyers were required to provide
five men or three married couples as labourers for every 100 acres
purchased. This was a difficult and expensive requirement. For every 300
acre tract, a buyer must agree to bring fifteen labourers or nine
married couples from England to Vancouver Island and support them while
they worked the land. (Mackie, p. 13)
Two
other requirements deterred potential colonists in England, as well.
Land purchase money was required in advance before buyers could view the
property and the only land available to independent settlers was far
from the Fort since the HBC had reserved the closest ten square miles.
(Roderick Finlayson, Biography, p. 24)
Beacon Hill Park is set aside as a “Park Reserve”
The
Wakefield System required public land tracts called “Reserves” be
established according to a specific formula. For every eight square
miles of land sold to private buyers, a square mile was to be reserved
for “church and churchyard, schools, or other public purposes.” Parks
were included in the category “other public purposes.” In a list of
“Public Reserves, Victoria, 1851-1858," Beacon Hill Park appears as
“Park Reserve, Victoria District 178.98 acres.” (Mackie, p. 26)
The above map, provided courtesy of Richard Mackie, was first published
in his article “The Colonization of Vancouver Island, 1849-58,” BC Studies,
No. 96, Winter, 1992-93, pp. 3-40. The map has been enhanced by Ken Lajoie.
Though
Beacon Hill Park was set aside to fulfill one of the requirements of
the Wakefield System, popular histories of Victoria do not mention it.
Instead, praise and full credit is awarded to James Douglas personally
for preserving Park land. A typical report in 1971 assumed Douglas was
motivated by the noble “desire to provide open spaces for future
generations...” and stated he personally kept the Park safe from
“grasping hands...” (Archie H. Wills, Colonist, Feb.28, 1971, p.12-13)
As
an agent for the HBC and the British government, Douglas was authorized
to determine the nature of the “Park Reserve” and he was dividing land
as instructed. Thus, Douglas was in a position to select the specific
acreage within the "Park Reserve" and to sketch out Park boundaries
himself before any official survey was available. By the time the “Park
Reserve” was officially recognized by London on Feb. 23, 1859, the size
of the park had been significantly reduced. “Grasping hands” had managed
to acquire part of the Park and two of those hands belonged to James
Douglas. By August, 1852, he had purchased the northeast corner of the
Park himself, adding it to his personal "Fairfield Farm" estate. The
following map, showing property boundaries in 1858 Victoria, is provided
courtesy of Richard Mackie. It was first published in his article “The
Colonization of Vancouver Island, 1849-58,” BC Studies, No. 96, Winter, 1992-93.
The
Wakefield System’s success was dependent on two factors: the
availability of cheap labour and an abundance of good agricultural land.
Unfortunately, not only were labourers in short supply, but also, the
amount of arable land in the Victoria area was limited. The HBC sent 641
immigrants between 1848-1854 to work on Company farms plus some
indentured servants. About 400 of them settled permanently on the
island. The Lekwungen were available as labourers at cheap wages from
the first, along with French Canadians and Metis labourers. Labourers
known as Kanaka were brought to Victoria from Hawaii, where the HBC had
an outpost. Chinese became an important source of labour in Victoria
later. The labour requirement of the Wakefield System proved impossible;
it was relaxed in 1852 for landowners already residents of the colony,
most of whom were Company employees.
Historican Richard Mackie concluded:
“The Wakefield System worked for those with money. It resulted in a
conservative, atavistic, hierarchical, and land-based political culture
dominated by those who could afford to buy land, most of whom were
former and active Hudson’s Bay Company employees...it resulted in the
creation of a stratified colonial society where political power was
vested, as in Britain, in the ownership of land.” (Mackie, p. 31-32)
Douglas
needed surveys and accurate maps of the area in order to carry out
proscribed Wakefield land policies. While waiting for a surveyor to
arrive, Douglas divided up land around Fort Victoria himself. In this
way, Douglas and other HBC employees were able to select the first
tracts. The largest Victoria landowners were not the “gentlemen” hoped
for by the British government, therefore, but instead were middle class
HBC employees. Not only did Company officers become the elite landowners
in Victoria, many successfully made the transition from the fur trade
to become Founding Fathers of the City and members of the Colonial
government.
Captain Grant shoots a cow on Beacon Hill
Capt.
Walter Colquhoun Grant was hired by the HBC--at 100 pounds a year--to
survey the Fort Victoria area so that property could be divided and sold
to new settlers. Grant is said to be the first landowner on Vancouver
Island independent of the HBC. (Willard E. Ireland, “Capt. Walter
Calquhoun Grant: Vancouver Island’s First Independent Settler,” BCHQ, p. 87) Grant did, however, start out as an employee of the Company, though he proved an unsatisfactory and temporary one.
A
“Reminiscence” by Joseph W. McKay described Grant shooting a cow in
Beacon Hill Park just minutes after his arrival in Victoria on August
11, 1849. Grant arrived in a “canoe from Fort Nisqually on Puget Sound”
paddled by “Indians.” After they landed at Clover Point, he “followed
the path along the east side of Beacon Hill” on the way to the Fort.
Grant was surrounded by a herd of animals he identified as “wild
buffalo” and shot the most forward animal. Angus MacPhail, in charge of
the Fort dairy, reported to Douglas that night that “one of his best
milch cows had been killed.” McKay also described a later incident when
Grant got lost walking from his Sooke farm to the Fort. He was rescued
after five hungry days in the forest. (J. W. McKay account printed in
the Colonist,
April 18, 1935, p. 6) Grant could apparently be inept, clueless and
strange, yet also give what Willard E. Ireland calls “one of the ablest
accounts of the prospects and progress of the evolving colony
available.” (Ireland, “Capt. Walter Calquhoun Grant,” BCHQ, p. 118)
Historical
accounts often mention men like Grant landing at Clover Point and
walking through the Park to reach the Fort but these accounts do not
describe what boat crews did with loaded canoes. If bad weather made
paddling around Ogden Point difficult or impossible, canoes sometimes
were able to travel inland from Ross Bay following a stream which
emerged where the Empress Hotel now stands. According to "Lost Streams
of Victoria,” a map with commentary by Jennifer Sutherst:
"The stream that the Empress hotel was built upon was unnamed and
flowed from a wetland in the vicinity of Cook and Moss streets. This
wetland was connected to another creek which ran into Ross Bay thus
linking the bay with Victoria's inner harbour. Oral history indicates
that the First Nations would use this waterway as an alternate route
during heavy winter storms. During wet winter periods when the tides
were high they would be able to paddle from Ross Bay to the inner
harbour thereby avoiding the heavy weather on the outer coast."
(Jennifer Sutherst, "Lost Streams of Victoria," May, 2003. South Islands
Aquatic Stewardship Society and Fisheries and Oceans Canada.)
From
London, Grant had arranged to purchase 100 acres of land and he brought
eight men from England to farm it. On arrival, he discovered HBC
employees owned the best land near the fort and was forced to choose
property in Sooke. Grant knew nothing about farming or surveying.
After
producing no surveys and proving to himself and Douglas that he was not
capable of doing the job, he resigned as surveyor on March 25, 1850.
All he completed was a “sketch” of the nearby fort area. Though there is
no evidence to support the idea, it is a compelling notion to blame the
incompetent Grant for a bizarre map of the shoreline of Beacon Hill
Park which omitted Finlayson Point. In place of that prominent piece of
land extending south into the Strait, the incorrect early map showed a
large bay extending north into the centre of Beacon Hill. A 1995 City of
Victoria Park Department digital map, titled “Beacon Hill Park Surplus
Acreage,” superimposed the corrected current shoreline over the old
incorrect shoreline, resulting in a gain of 29.393 acres of “surplus”
land to the Park.
Grant
is known to historians for two descriptive papers he presented to the
Royal Geographical Society in London, in 1857 and 1859. Independent
perspectives (non-HBC) of Vancouver Island were rare, so his words are
often quoted. In these lectures and in personal letters, Grant
criticized the HBC for reserving the best land near Victoria and
complained he had only “rascally indians” for company isolated in Sooke.
He said “natives” were “useless” but “harmless.” (James Hendrickson,
“Two Letters from Walter Colquhoun Grant,” BC Studies,
#26, Summer, 1975, p. 13) Grant was surprised how “indians” had a name
for every feature. In Sooke Harbour, he said, “every little point to
which a white man would not dream of giving a name has its separate
appellation.” (Robin Fisher, Contact and Conflict, p. 103) Instead of seeing this as evidence of their intimate knowledge and connection to the land, he just thought it peculiar.
1850
Aboriginal treaties give land to “the white people forever”
James
Douglas explained in a September, 1849 letter to London the urgency of
reaching a land accommodation with the local aboriginal people: “Some
arrangements should be made as soon as possible with the Native Tribes
for the purchase of their lands....I would also strongly recommend,
equally as a measure of justice, and from a regard to the future peace
of the Colony, that Indians Fisher [ie]s, Village Sit[e]s and fields,
should be reserved for their benefit and fully secured to them by law.”
(Douglas to Barclay, September 3, 1849, HBCA) In December, 1849, Douglas
was authorized to extinguish, on behalf of the crown, the proprietary
rights of the Native people of the island.
Between
1850 and 1854, Douglas made 14 treaties with indigenous peoples living
around Victoria, Nanaimo and Fort Rupert. The land involved became “the
entire property of the white people forever.” Aboriginals were allotted
village sites and specified acreage, and they were assured they could
continue to hunt in unoccupied lands and to fish as usual.
Wilson
Duff, former Curator of Anthropology at the British Columbia Provincial
Museum, explained, “Douglas took the usual British view that although
the absolute title to the land was vested in the Crown, the Indians did
own some proprietary rights to it that should be extinguished by making
treaties and paying compensation.” (Duff, The Indian History of British Columbia,
p. 61) By contrast, France, during its years as a colonizing power in
Canada, never compensated aboriginals for loss of land. They did not
recognize aboriginal proprietary rights and never negotiated treaties.
The
six treaties with the Lekwungen of the Victoria area, signed on April
29 and April 30, 1850, were the first of the fourteen treaties that
Douglas negotiated with First Peoples on the Island. On paper, each
Victoria area group was allotted a number of Pounds Sterling, varying
from 27 to 79, based on what Douglas assumed the value of the land was
for farming.
Beacon
Hill Park was part of the area listed as belonging to the “Swengwhung
Tribe.” Officially, they received 75 pounds sterling for their property,
though no money changed hands. James Douglas described the details of
the arrangement in a letter to Barclay, May 16, 1850: "They were paid in
goods, mostly blankets, from the Fort Victoria stores and the value to
the Indians included a markup of approximately 300% over the
'department' or wholesale price. The Songhees, for instance, received
goods with a retail price of 309.10.0 Pounds but the cost to the company
had actually been 103.14.0 Pounds." (Fisher, p. 67)
Wilson
Duff believed “Douglas took the most pragmatic approach: pay them the
least amount that will satisfy them. He made the payments in a form
appropriate to the times, ‘in woolen goods which they prefer to money.’”
The Songhees “accepted 371 blankets and a cap for Tlolemitstin” and the
District of Victoria became ‘the Entire property of the White people
forever.’” (Duff, pp. 16, 55)
The key words of the treaty by which the Lekwungen gave up Beacon Hill Park and the Victoria area are:
[The Lekwungen] “...surrender, entirely and for ever...the whole of
the lands situate and lying between the Island of the Dead, in the Arm
or Inlet of Camoson, where the Kosampson lands terminate, extending east
to the Fountain Ridge, and following it to its termination on the
Straits of De Fuca, in the Bay immediately east of Clover Point,
including all the country between that line and the Inlet of Camoson.”
(Duff, “The Fort Victoria Treaties,” p. 12)
An
elderly chief who said he was present at the potlatch treaty signing
event described it in detail to a newspaper reporter in 1934. Chief
David Latass (or Latasse) told Frank Pagett: “I was twenty-one when
Governor Douglas gave a big party to the Indians of southern Vancouver
Island. The entertainment took place at Beacon Hill on May 24,
1850...The natives were seated in big circles, the chiefs forming the
inner-most line, the lesser braves being further to the rear...women and
children hung around the outskirts of the circles of men...Hudson’s Bay
men distributed hard biscuits smeared with molasses...” (Victoria Daily Times, Magazine Section pp. 1, 8, July 14, 1934.)
At
the time of the interview, Chief David said he was 105 years old.
Though he was clearly very old in 1934 and described by the reporter as
“extremely fragile,” it is doubtful his birthdate could be so precisely
known. If born in 1829, he would have been age fourteen when the “first
white men” came to Victoria Harbour in 1843 and age twenty-one at the
treaty signing “powwow” on Beacon Hill, as he stated. It is possible the
account is true; it is also possible he witnessed the treaty event as a
young boy or it was described to him later by an elder who was present.
According
to Chief David, aboriginal land was not sold to the Hudson’s Bay
Company; it was rented. “We knowing a crop grows each year, looked for
gifts each year, what is now called rent...The Indians were great
bargainers and they would not have had any idea of letting the whites
use their land from year to year unless some equivalent trade or gift be
made each year.” He believed decades of rent were due to his people.
Chief
Robert Sam of the Songhees (Lekwungen Nation), in a speech in Victoria
on May 25, 2000, gave his version of the contract: "This land, we did
not forfeit to anyone. A treaty was signed for 147 Hudson's Bay blankets
for borrowing this land. The blankets that were shared with the
Lekwungen Nation have long since disintegrated. We have never sold our
land." (The Raven’s Eye, the Aboriginal Newspaper of British Columbia & Yukon, June 10, 2000.)
It
is very likely the Lekwungen assumed they were agreeing to “share” the
land in the treaty process, as Chief Sam believes, or "rent" it as Chief
Latass stated. There are also indications they thought a peace
agreement was being “signed”. Problems with language were certain and
cannot be over-emphasized. Historian John Lutz points out “There is some
evidence that Joseph McKay could speak the local Salish dialect but it
is hard to believe he was proficient....Whether McKay was used as a
translator or whether they used the Chinook jargon, there was...[ample]
room for misunderstanding and reinterpretation on both sides.”
(September 7, 2003 communication)
Every
European concept involved in the treaty process was unfamiliar to the
Lekwungen, even the idea of an agreement on a piece of paper. “Land
ownership” and “forever” had different meanings in the two cultures.
Another difficulty was that treaty negotiations took place out of sight
of most or all of the landmarks under discussion. The Lekwungen had
different names for land features than the British so verbal
descriptions of land boundaries must have been confusing. If maps were
used, it is not likely they were helpful to the Lekwungen because they
were unfamiliar with paper maps and could not read.
The
Lekwungen men were shown how to make X “marks” on blank pieces of
paper, which Douglas attached later to the formal treaty documents after
they were printed in London. Signing a blank piece of paper would be a
questionable procedure for people in the white culture accustomed to
signing legal documents. It is unlikely the Lekwungen could understand
that an X on a blank page meant agreement to an invisible but binding
document.
Douglas
decided to ignore the overlapping areas of aboriginal use and draw
arbitrary lines indicating “ownership” by just one group for each piece
of land. Though this was the only way he could see to formalize the
transfer, his lines did not match the more complicated actual
situations, in which land was used and shared in different ways for
different purposes. As Duff explains, “Shared territories had no place
in his conception of the situation.” (“The Fort Victoria Treaties,” p.
46) The Cadboro Bay village site, for example, was a shared village, but
was awarded to the Chekonein as Douglas divided the area up. In the
current three-way treaty negotiations between British Columbia, Canada
and First Nations peoples, overlapping land claims by adjacent
aboriginal groups continue to complicate land settlements agreements.
Though
the Lekwungen received only a small plot of Songhees Reserve land plus
371 blankets and one cap in exchange for miles of prime land, even that
small compensation was criticized by Governor Richard Blanshard. In a
report to Lord Grey, Blanshard said the amount Douglas paid to the
“Indians” was “unnecessarily generous”. This was echoed loudly by later
officials, white settlers and the publisher of the British Colonist,
Amor de Cosmos. Joseph Trutch, in charge of Indian land policy from 1864
to 1871, said, “...the Indians really have no right to the lands they
claim...” Under Trutch, British Columbia aboriginals lost much of the
land acquired under Douglas. (Fisher, pp. 160-162)
Whatever
“forever” was supposed to mean, it didn’t last long for the Songhees
Reserve. From the time Victoria’s white population exploded during the
Gold Rush of 1858, the City attempted to acquire the valuable Reserve
land. Finally, in December, 1911, the Lekwungen surrendered the Songhees
Reserve and moved to the Esquimalt Reserve. In exchange for giving up
the treaty land, $10,000 was paid to each head of a family.
James
Douglas purchased 300 acres along the east boundary of the Park in
1850, before the area was officially surveyed. As Chief Factor of the
HBC, he was in the position to choose a land parcel first and sell it to
himself. This tract of land, called ‘Fairfield Farm,’ was expanded to
418 acres by August, 1852. That expansion included the northeast corner
of what had originally been set aside as Beacon Hill Park land.
John
Adams comments: “In total Douglas had made a land grab of monumental
proportions even before the district had been fully surveyed. He had
used his position to purchase land for himself in the choicest
agricultural area close to the fort, and had used his authority to
protect a valuable piece of land on his very doorstep.” (Old Square Toes and His Lady,
p. 86) There were personal benefits for Douglas in assuring a “public
park” lay along the western boundary of his own property. After Douglas
retired, he walked or rode every morning from his James Bay house
through the Park to his farm, circling Beacon Hill, arriving home in
time for breakfast.
The
following 1858 map shows the "Original Properties of the five founding
families of Victoria.” The map shows a City area of small town lots
surrounded by huge tracts of land owned privately by HBC officers. In
addition to Douglas, large land owners included William McNeill, John
Work, John Tod and Charles Ross, Roderick Finlayson, J. D. Pemberton.
(The properties of James Tod and George Blenkinsop are to the north and
are omitted from this map reproduction.)
This map is based on a map provided courtesy of Sylvia Van Kirk,
published in "Tracing the fortunes of five founding families of Victoria," BC Studies, no.115/116, Autumn/Winter, 1997/98, p.148.
The map was enhanced by Ken Lajoie.
Anyone
not employed by the HBC could not choose the closest property and were
forced to pay higher prices at the company store, as well. Douglas
administered the Wakefield System to give advantage to HBC insiders in
every way possible.
Beacon Hill lookout
Dr.
John Sebastian Helmcken described the beacon on the Park hill as it
appeared in 1850: “On Beacon Hill, stood a pole with a cask on top, and
another beacon closer to the beach, these were guides to the harbour,
hence the name Beacon Hill. The cask was riddled with bullets, it being a
target at which some practiced for fun.” (The Reminiscences of Dr. John Sebastian Helmcken, edited by Dorothy Blakey Smith, p. 105)
Helmcken
explained Beacon Hill’s usefulness as a lookout for ships: “[Captain
James] Sangster had charge of the Cadboro and was pilot in general. He
it was who used to sit on Beacon Hill, spy glass in hand, looking for
any of the Company’s ships rounding Rocky Point or any other expected
vessel.” Helmcken added that the custom was for a ship to fire two guns
after rounding Rocky Point to give notice of arrival and the need for a
pilot. (Reminiscences, p. 125)
1851
James
Douglas replaced Richard Blanshard as Governor of Vancouver Island in
June, 1851. Douglas now held the two top positions simultaneously, Chief
Factor of the Hudson’s Bay Company and Governor of the Colony.
Independent white settlers charged that Douglas would favour the Company
in his decisions and that conflicts of interests were inevitable. They
were correct.
Joseph
Despard Pemberton, an Irish surveyor and engineer, arrived in Victoria
in 1851. He conducted the first competent official surveys of the area.
William
John Macdonald, another Scot hired by the HBC, arrived in Victoria on
May 14, 1851. His Reminiscences include a horse ride the next day:
“...off we went for a scamper round Beacon Hill and Clover Point...wild
clover over those parts a foot high.” Macdonald described aspects of
life in the Fort: “Milk and butter in abundance, the Company having a
dairy of one hundred cows on the hill.... At this time there were no
houses outside the Fort, all the officers and men about seventy in all,
lived inside the Fort, gates locked every night and watchmen set.”
(Burns, Flora Hamilton, “Victoria in the 1850's,” The Beaver,
December 1949, p.37) [In 1877 W. J. Macdonald was appointed by the Lt.
Gov. to be one of the two trustees of Beacon Hill Park. He was also
twice elected Mayor of Victoria.]
In
1851, Douglas tried without success to convince London to deduct acres
of rocks and swamp from the purchase price of land in the Victoria area.
He advocated charging purchasers the set price of one pound per acre
only for those acres good for agriculture. (“Fort Victoria Letters,” p.
174)
Capt.
Walter Colquhoun Grant planted Scotch Broom seeds at his farm in 1851.
Though Grant is known to historians for his lectures in England on
Vancouver Island, he is known to people who value native plants as the
one responsible for a continuing environmental problem. In 1850, though
his farm was struggling, Grant left for Hawaii where he stayed two
months. Archivist Willard Ireland writes, “Undoubtedly it was during
this visit to Hawaii that Grant procured the seeds of the broom which
local tradition credits him with introducing into this Province.”
(Willard E. Ireland, BCHA,
vol. XVII, Jan-April, 1953, p. 114) When he returned from Hawaii in
late February, 1851, Grant planted those seeds on his Sooke farm. John
Muir, the next owner of the property, wanted to eradicate the broom
plants. According to his son, Douglas, they were preserved because they
reminded Mrs. Muir of Scotland. (Ireland, p. 114)
Northwest Ridge broom patch.N. Ringuette, April, 2004.
Since
then the exotic shrub has spread through Beacon Hill Park and the
region, filling in open meadows and crowding out native species.
Broom
adversely affected butterflies as well: “Of all the alien plant species
that have been introduced to the region, the most detrimental for
butterflies has been an invasive, yellow-flowered shrub called Scotch
Broom...[It] has spelled disaster for butterflies ever since...taking
over natural meadows and crowding out most of the native flora.” (Nancy
Baron and Frances Backhouse, “Rare Butterflies of Southeastern Vancouver
Island and the Gulf Islands,” p. 1)
James Douglas reported in an April, 1851 letter that “about 100 Indians
[are] employed in clearing Brush and trees and bringing new land into
cultivation.”
1852
Douglas buys the northeast corner of the Park
Douglas
began building a house in 1850 on another piece of property he owned in
James Bay, where the Royal BC Museum stands now. He moved from the Fort
to that house in October, 1852. The walls were plastered with lime made
from clam shells collected by the Lekwungen. (James Anderson, “Notes
and Comments,” BCA) It was a short ride from his James Bay home across
Beacon Hill Park to visit Fairfield Farm.
The
300 acres Douglas purchased in 1850 along the east edge of the Park,
called ‘Fairfield Farm,’ was expanded to 418 acres by August 1852. The
extra acres acquired by Douglas included two parcels along the east edge
of his property plus a third parcel, an estimated 24 acres of the
northeast corner of Beacon Hill Park.
The
north-south strip left between the new northeastern Park boundary and
the Douglas property, approximately 8 acres, was then sold by the HBC to
private landowners. The HBC lot sales led to a legal challenge. The
case was decided against the HBC in 1862 but the new owners were allowed
to keep the property. Accounts of this legal case never mention the
majority of the northeast corner was owned privately by James Douglas.
In total, an estimated 32 acres of Park land were lost. (It is possible
that a further section along the north boundary was also sold, but since
map boundary lines vary and conflict through the years, that is
unclear.)
Most
of the ten square miles set aside for the HBC in downtown Victoria was
opened for sale. “In 1851 and 1852, Finlayson, Work, Tolmie and others
bought land and established farms in the former trade reserve.” (Mackie,
p. 33)
The
streets of the Victoria townsite were officially laid out in 1852.
Bills of the Colony showed payment “to Indians for labour in surveying
of 6.15.5 Pounds” and 28,12.2 Pounds paid to “Indians and others”
engaged in making public roads.
The
“Indian population” on Vancouver Island was approximately 11,000
(though the estimate had been 30,000 just two years before) and the
non-Indian population was 500.
Douglas uses force in two confrontations
A
confrontation between the Lekwungen and white settlers occurred in
1852, again over cattle. HBC men went to the Songhees village to arrest a
cattle thief but were driven off. The Beaver was then placed opposite
the village with cannons trained on the village. Douglas reported on
March 27, 1852, “the Fort guns were also turned upon it but before any
offensive measures were taken the Indians beat a parley and returned the
property...They are now mustering property among them to pay for the
cattle stolen...” (Bowsfield, “Fort Victoria Letters,” p. 164)
James
Douglas acted forcefully again in 1852 when a white shepherd was killed
by an aboriginal near Victoria. He assembled 150 men, mostly off a
naval ship, and told the Cowichan to give up the murderer or he would
“burn out your lodges and trample out your tribes.” The Cowichan handed
over a man said to be the murderer. (Cole Harris, The Resettlement of British Columbia,
p. 65) Douglas had witnessed a very similar verbal threat and display
of force by Governor Simpson at Fort St. James in the 1830's.
William
John Macdonald described the Cowichan confrontation differently in his
Reminiscences. In his version, it happened in 1856. He said he went with
Douglas as Captain of a Militia of 50 men. Then Macdonald added, “I had
to train and organize a body of 50 men to guard the Coast from the
depredations of the Northern Indians, who used to land on their way home
and shoot cattle.” (Burns, Flora Hamilton, “Victoria in the 1850's,” The Beaver, December 1949, p.38)
Though
the most common threat of Company officers was to blow aboriginals up
with gunpowder, a variety of other threats were used. At Fort George,
Douglas McDougall showed chiefs “a small bottle and told them it
contained smallpox and threatened to release the disease.” (Cole Harris,
The Resettlement of British Columbia,
p. 57) When stationed in Kamloops in the 1840's, John Tod lied to the
First Peoples there that smallpox was approaching and successfully
turned resistant natives into grateful vaccination supplicants.
1853
A
public birthday celebration was held in Beacon Hill Park in honour of
James Douglas, Jr., age two, It was a major public event with horse
races, prize fights, bagpipes, fiddles and dancing. (John Adams, Old Square Toes and His Lady, p. 101.)
“The
lives of the Songhees people changed even more in the fall of 1853,
when about 3,000 First Nations visitors from the north began arriving in
their territory to work and trade at the Fort.” (Keddie, Songhees Pictorial, p. 40) The Haida, Stikine, Cowichan and Fort Simpson visitors vastly outnumbered the local people.
William
John Macdonald, the HBC employee who would later become a trustee of
Beacon Hill Park under the Colonial Government, stated in his
Reminiscences that there were “not more than 200 white people in the
whole Colony” in 1853.
1854
Though
they had not received permission from London to do so, by 1854 Douglas
and Pemberton had figured a way to adjust the price of one pound per
acre so land purchasers would pay only for good agricultural land. They
interpreted the landscape to discount a “liberal allowance for rock and
swamp.” Douglas had tried to convince the company to do this as early as
1851. Finally, in 1855, London advised Pemberton he could use
discretionary power in charging for rocks and swamp and in 1856, this
became part of colonial land law. Douglas also set up payment on the
installment plan for land in 1856.
Historian
Robin Fisher points to another land loss for area aboriginals:
"Contained within the HBC land around Fort Victoria was a ten acre
Indian reserve,” which was acknowledged by all in 1854. "But by the end
of the decade the land had been re-allotted as the site of the
government offices." This can be seen in a “1861 Map of Victoria and
Part of Esquimalt District.” The Legislature is sitting today on that
land. The Lekwungen did not receive even one blanket in exchange.
(Fisher, Contact and Conflict, p. 68)
An
official census of the white population at the end of 1854 found the
total on all of Vancouver Island was 744. The population of Fort
Victoria was 232. There were 79 houses built close to the Fort. On farms
and settlements near Victoria were 154 more whites. (Akrigg, p. 80)
Bishop Edward Cridge thought the colony’s entire white population was
about 600 in April, 1855. (Mackie, p. 29)
1856
To
qualify to vote, male colonists had to own 20 acres of land. 43
colonists qualified to elect the seven member Assembly in 1856. Only
males owning 300 acres or more could run for office. Native people were
not entitled to own land or vote. Richard Mackie explains: “By charging
one pound per acre and linking the franchise to the ownership of land,
the Colonial Office forged a legal and formal connection between wealth,
land, and political power.” (Mackie, p. 25)
The
HBC was always in need of labourers for their subsidiary companies
(they operated coal mines, farms and sawmills). Four large farms,
including Craigflower Farm, were run in the Victoria area by the Puget
Sound Agricultural Company (PSAC), a subsidiary of the HBC. Douglas was
the salaried “agent” for this company, along with his many other
salaried jobs. The PSAC brought “several hundred” indentured servants to
help work the land and also imported Kanaka workers from Hawaii. Later,
in 1858, racial tension in California between whites and blacks led
Douglas to invite blacks to Victoria. 35 came first with up to 800
following in the next two years.
The
aboriginal population of Vancouver Island was 25,873 in 1856. (Helmcken
Papers, BCA) “The Native population... constituted the largest,
cheapest, most accessible and most knowledgeable pool of labour in the
colony.” (Mackie, p. 23) They helped construct European houses, cleared
land, built roads, made shingles, tended colonist gardens, worked as
domestics and filled in part of the harbour.
1857
James
Deans, who Dr. Grant Keddie calls “Victoria’s first notable
archaeological enthusiast,” counted twenty-three cairns on the sides and
the summit of Beacon Hill in 1857. Deans stated the cairns were visible
for the next twenty years, until 1877, but when he revisited the
“ancient cemetery” in 1897, many of the surface boulders of the cairns
were moved or completely gone. White immigrants were responsible for
removing the boulders.
“Victoria
in 1857 was a little hamlet of a few hundred souls.” The discovery of
gold in the Fraser River was about to drastically change the “sleepy
little backwoods trading post”. (Scholefield, p. 557, 562)